Overall assessment of the aspect area 'follow-up, actions and feedback'

In the overall assessment, the aspect area 'follow-up, actions and feedback' is deemed to be satisfactory.

Regarding the aspect 'third-cycle programme environment', the description of the structural relations of the various forums mentioned was unclear in the self-evaluation as were the processes of follow-up and responsibility for action.

Across the aspect area 'design, teaching/learning and outcomes', the panel sees that there is a valuable structure for evaluation and feedback provided by the higher education institution, but there are areas that need improvement with regard to the more rigorous use of individual study plans. The assessment panel emphasises the good example of an active and collaborative supervisory group that is constantly engaged in optimising follow-up, actions taken and feedback, and the existence of initiatives such as the supervisors' collegium. The understanding of 'stakeholders' is wide-ranging and plausible, involving the building sector, the public, expert groups, political organisations, and funding bodies.

In the 'working life perspective', the follow-up with alumni is currently a blind spot and is a potential area of improvement. When it comes to the 'doctoral student perspective', the panel notes that doctoral students’ answers to questionnaires could be used to improve the programme. The institution is commended for the work not only on focusing on a balanced recruitment of students and staff, but also working with the continuous evaluation of gender content of each research field.